Robotic Process Automation (RPA) in Tax Compliance: Improving Preparing and Filing Tax Returns Efficiency

Authors

  • Piyushkumar Patel Accounting Consultant at Steelbro International Co., Inc, USA Author

Keywords:

Robotic Process Automation (RPA), tax compliance, tax filing efficiency, RPA use cases in tax

Abstract

Robotic process automation (RPA) is revolutionizing tax compliance by simplifying tax return preparation and filing, therefore fostering increased accuracy and efficiency. During tax compliance processes, data collecting, validation, and reporting are among time-consuming, repetitious chores that could go wrong and waste time. RPA utilizes software bots to automate processes, allowing tax professionals to concentrate on strategic activities such as tax planning and risk management. Through the integration of RPA, enterprises may minimize manual errors, maintain consistency in computations, and adhere to stringent timelines while upholding regulatory standards. RPA facilitates effortless integration with current accounting and tax software, extracting and processing data from many sources, such as spreadsheets, ERP systems, and external tax authority portals. This automation expedites operations including VAT reconciliation, income tax submissions, and regulatory filings, ensuring firms remain compliant with changing tax legislation. Furthermore, RPA's flexibility comes quite handy during tax season when workloads rise greatly. The ability of the technology to keep correct records and offer audit trails promotes openness and speeds audits, therefore lowering the risks related with non-compliance. As enterprises traverse a progressively intricate tax environment, RPA not only provides cost efficiencies but also guarantees agility and resilience by swiftly adjusting to regulatory modifications. Robotic process automation (RPA) is altering tax compliance by streamlining tax return preparation and filing, therefore fostering more accuracy and efficiency. During tax compliance processes, data collecting, validation, and reporting are among time-consuming, repetitious chores that could go wrong and cost money.

References

1. Cooper, L. A., Holderness Jr, D. K., Sorensen, T. L., & Wood, D. A. (2019). Robotic process automation in public accounting. Accounting Horizons, 33(4), 15-35.

2. Jeyaraj, A., & Sethi, V. (2020). Embedding Robotic Process Automation into Process Management: Case Study of using taskt. AIS Transactions on Enterprise Systems, 5(1), 1.

3. Renner, M. (2019). Software robot-based automation of financial administration’s processes.

4. Kokina, J., & Blanchette, S. (2019). Early evidence of digital labor in accounting: Innovation with Robotic Process Automation. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 35, 100431.

5. Ilo, N. (2018). Robotic Process Automation implementation in record-to-report process.

6. Gotthardt, M., Koivulaakso, D., Paksoy, O., Saramo, C., Martikainen, M., & Lehner, O. (2020). Current state and challenges in the implementation of smart robotic process automation in accounting and auditing. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives.

7. Jędrzejka, D. (2019). Robotic process automation and its impact on accounting. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, (105), 137-166.

8. Lacurezeanu, R., Tiron-Tudor, A., & Bresfelean, V. P. (2020). Robotic process automation in audit and accounting. Audit Financiar, 18(4), 752-770.

9. Hale, A., & Deutsch, J. (2017). Best Practices in Tax Compliance Outsourcing. Tax Executive, 69, 33.

10. Bhardwaj, R., & Sharma, H. O. (2019). Invoice Processing Non PO Tax Coding.

11. Rozario, A. M., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2018). How Robotic Process Automation Is Transforming Accounting and Auditing. CPA Journal, 88(6).

12. Lacity, M., Willcocks, L. P., & Craig, A. (2015). Robotic process automation at Telefonica O2.

13. Mendling, J., Decker, G., Hull, R., Reijers, H. A., & Weber, I. (2018). How do machine learning, robotic process automation, and blockchains affect the human factor in business process management?. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 43(1), 19.

14. Willcocks, L., Lacity, M., & Craig, A. (2017). Robotic process automation: strategic transformation lever for global business services?. Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases, 7(1), 17-28.

15. Rainey, S. K., Brown, B., & Kirk, D. B. (2017). Bots, natural language processing, and machine learning. Tax Executive, 69, 39.

16. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2021). Data Analysis Best Practices for EDI Migration Success. MZ Computing Journal, 2(1).

17. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2021). The Future of EDI Standards in an API-Driven World. MZ Computing Journal, 2(2).

18. Gade, K. R. (2021). Cost Optimization Strategies for Cloud Migrations. MZ Computing Journal, 2(2).

19. Gade, K. R. (2021). Cloud Migration: Challenges and Best Practices for Migrating Legacy Systems to the Cloud. Innovative Engineering Sciences Journal, 1(1).

20. Katari, A., Muthsyala, A., & Allam, H. HYBRID CLOUD ARCHITECTURES FOR FINANCIAL DATA LAKES: DESIGN PATTERNS AND USE CASES.

21. Komandla, V. Strategic Feature Prioritization: Maximizing Value through User-Centric Roadmaps.

22. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2020). Exploring the Impact of JSON and XML on EDI Data Formats. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 6(1).

23. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2020). Large Scale Migrations: Lessons Learned from EDI Projects. Journal of Innovative Technologies, 3(1).

24. Gade, K. R. (2020). Data Mesh Architecture: A Scalable and Resilient Approach to Data Management. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 6(1).

25. Katari, A. Conflict Resolution Strategies in Financial Data Replication Systems.

26. Boda, V. V. R., & Immaneni, J. (2021). Healthcare in the Fast Lane: How Kubernetes and Microservices Are Making It Happen. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 7(1).

27. Immaneni, J. (2021). Using Swarm Intelligence and Graph Databases for Real-Time Fraud Detection. Journal of Computational Innovation, 1(1).

28. Nookala, G., Gade, K. R., Dulam, N., & Thumburu, S. K. R. (2021). Unified Data Architectures: Blending Data Lake, Data Warehouse, and Data Mart Architectures. MZ Computing Journal, 2(2).

29. Nookala, G. (2021). Automated Data Warehouse Optimization Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Journal of Computational Innovation, 1(1).

30. Immaneni, J. (2020). Cloud Migration for Fintech: How Kubernetes Enables Multi-Cloud Success. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 6(1).

31. Muneer Ahmed Salamkar. ETL Vs ELT: A Comprehensive Exploration of Both Methodologies, Including Real-World Applications and Trade-Offs. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, Mar. 2019

32. Muneer Ahmed Salamkar. Next-Generation Data Warehousing: Innovations in Cloud-Native Data Warehouses and the Rise of Serverless Architectures. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, Apr. 2019

33. Muneer Ahmed Salamkar. Real-Time Data Processing: A Deep Dive into Frameworks Like Apache Kafka and Apache Pulsar. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, July 2019

34. Muneer Ahmed Salamkar, and Karthik Allam. “Data Lakes Vs. Data Warehouses: Comparative Analysis on When to Use Each, With Case Studies Illustrating Successful Implementations”. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, Sept. 2019

35. Naresh Dulam. Data Lakes: Building Flexible Architectures for Big Data Storage. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, Oct. 2015, pp. 95-114

36. Naresh Dulam. The Rise of Kubernetes: Managing Containers in Distributed Systems. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, July 2015, pp. 73-94

37. Naresh Dulam. Snowflake: A New Era of Cloud Data Warehousing. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, Apr. 2015, pp. 49-72

38. Naresh Dulam. The Shift to Cloud-Native Data Analytics: AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Discussing the Growing Trend of Cloud-Native Big Data Processing Solutions. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 1, Feb. 2015, pp. 28-48

39. Sarbaree Mishra. A Novel Weight Normalization Technique to Improve Generative Adversarial Network Training. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, Sept. 2019

40. Sarbaree Mishra. “Moving Data Warehousing and Analytics to the Cloud to Improve Scalability, Performance and Cost-Efficiency”. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 6, Feb. 2020

41. Sarbaree Mishra, et al. “Training AI Models on Sensitive Data - the Federated Learning Approach”. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 6, Apr. 2020

42. Sarbaree Mishra. “Automating the Data Integration and ETL Pipelines through Machine Learning to Handle Massive Datasets in the Enterprise”. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 6, June 2020

43. Babulal Shaik. Network Isolation Techniques in Multi-Tenant EKS Clusters. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 6, July 2020

44. Babulal Shaik. Automating Compliance in Amazon EKS Clusters With Custom Policies . Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research and Applications, vol. 1, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 587-610

Published

21-12-2022

How to Cite

[1]
Piyushkumar Patel, “Robotic Process Automation (RPA) in Tax Compliance: Improving Preparing and Filing Tax Returns Efficiency”, African J. of Artificial Int. and Sust. Dev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 441–466, Dec. 2022, Accessed: Apr. 29, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ajaisd.org/index.php/publication/article/view/55